Abstract
Human behavioral tasks offer a window into reward
learning, attention, and decision-making in psychiatric
disorders. Translating observed choices and response
times into interpretable cognitive characteristics, however,
requires models that account for individual differences and
changing strategies. Motivated by major depressive
disorder, this talk presents a progression of statistical
approaches for understanding these behavioral processes. I
will discuss how reinforcement learning models can be
extended to distinguish engaged decision-making from
lapses, how drift-diffusion models incorporate response
times and the speed–accuracy trade-off, and how shared
latent factors connect information across multiple tasks.
Applications to the probabilistic reward and Flanker tasks
illustrate how these approaches reveal differences in
engagement and decision dynamics between individuals
with depression and healthy controls. I will conclude with
opportunities for integrating behavioral tasks and
neuroimaging data. Together, these developments
highlight the role of statistical modeling in characterizing
cognitive heterogeneity and advancing understanding of
mental disorders through computational psychiatry.